On 23/05/2014 09:11, Alexander Kornienko wrote:
On 23 May 2014 09:04, "Tobias Grosser" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 23/05/2014 09:02, Alexander Kornienko wrote:
Slightly shorter and more expensive, I would say.
It is just a minor change, but more expensive? That does not sound
beneficial?
s/expensive/expressive/ (Android keyboard...)
Also, you missed this question:
}
}
return llvm::make_error_code(llvm::errc::not_supported);
Should this line be changed too?
AFAIK, there's no shortcut for this error code. Success code is special, it
has a dedicated static member for simplicity and expressiveness.
Alright, thanks for the explanation!
Tobias
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
