plotfi marked an inline comment as done. plotfi added a comment. In D60974#1498240 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974#1498240>, @jakehehrlich wrote:
> This shouldn't emit the .tbe format at all, the .tbe format is meant to be in > near 1-1 correspondence with .so files, not with .o files. It has things like > DT_NEEDED, and DT_SONAME related information that don't make sense for .o > files for instance. > > If we put things under an --experimental flags, minimize what we add in the > first patch, and try and make each additional field added need based, I'm ok > with whatever being added to Clang assuming it doesn't interfere with other > parts of the compiler. That sounds good. I wasn't sure if you wanted straight up tbe or not. I can basically keep what we have here and make the heading line include an "experimental" tag so that it cant be directly read by the llvm-elfabi tool without some changes. I do think it should be sufficient to have some subset of tbe as a merging format in llvm-elbabi. Will post an update. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D60974 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
