alexfh added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/modernize-use-nullptr-basic.cpp:1
-// RUN: %check_clang_tidy -std=c++98 %s modernize-use-nullptr %t -- -- 
-Wno-non-literal-null-conversion
-//
----------------
gribozavr2 wrote:
> njames93 wrote:
> > alexfh wrote:
> > > IIRC, some of the modernize- checks were meant to be useful to make the 
> > > pre-C++11 code compile in C++11. This check is an example of this (maybe 
> > > the only one?). Limiting the check to C++11 and deleting this test is a 
> > > bit too radical.
> > I'm lost, this check is all about replacing assignment of pointer to 0 with 
> > `nullptr` a keyword which doesn't exist pre c++11, so this test case will 
> > just result in invalid code. Or am I missing the point?
> The idea, if I understand correctly, is that you start with C++98 code, apply 
> modernize-* checks, and get C++11 code.
Yep, at least for this particular check there are cases, which won't compile in 
C++11, but will compile after its fixes are applied. Not sure if this was ever 
used like this though.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D75538/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D75538



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to