martong added a comment.
The tests are getting better, thanks Endre!
================
Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/ctu-on-demand-parsing.c:5
+// RUN: cp "%S/Inputs/ctu-other.c" "%t/ctu-other.c"
+// RUN: echo '[{"directory":"%t","command":"gcc -c -std=c89 -Wno-visibility
ctu-other.c","file":"ctu-other.c"}]' | sed -e 's/\\/\\\\/g' >
%t/compile_commands.json
+// RUN: cd "%t" && %clang_extdef_map ctu-other.c > externalDefMap.txt
----------------
Why do we need the `-Wno-visibility` flag?
================
Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/ctu-on-demand-parsing.c:6
+// RUN: echo '[{"directory":"%t","command":"gcc -c -std=c89 -Wno-visibility
ctu-other.c","file":"ctu-other.c"}]' | sed -e 's/\\/\\\\/g' >
%t/compile_commands.json
+// RUN: cd "%t" && %clang_extdef_map ctu-other.c > externalDefMap.txt
+// RUN: cd "%t" && %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -fsyntax-only
-std=c89 -analyze \
----------------
If we execute `clang_extdef_map` then we don't need
`Inputs/ctu-other.c[pp].externalDefMap.on-the-fly.txt` files. Do we?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D75665/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D75665
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
