rsmith added a comment.

In D89559#2339206 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559#2339206>, @erichkeane wrote:

> Since the work is 99% the same, I think I should start doing that (emitting 
> BOTH in the case where it matches the default member but NOT the default free 
> function CC) in this review, then do a separate commit for the MSVC compat 
> mode where we emit a version for ALL of the calling conventions.

You'll also need an overload resolution tiebreaker to ensure that `+[]{}` and 
the like are not ill-formed due to ambiguity.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to