rsmith added a comment. In D89559#2339206 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559#2339206>, @erichkeane wrote:
> Since the work is 99% the same, I think I should start doing that (emitting > BOTH in the case where it matches the default member but NOT the default free > function CC) in this review, then do a separate commit for the MSVC compat > mode where we emit a version for ALL of the calling conventions. You'll also need an overload resolution tiebreaker to ensure that `+[]{}` and the like are not ill-formed due to ambiguity. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits