erichkeane added a comment. In D89559#2340357 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559#2340357>, @rsmith wrote:
> In D89559#2339206 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559#2339206>, @erichkeane > wrote: > >> Since the work is 99% the same, I think I should start doing that (emitting >> BOTH in the case where it matches the default member but NOT the default >> free function CC) in this review, then do a separate commit for the MSVC >> compat mode where we emit a version for ALL of the calling conventions. > > You'll also need an overload resolution tiebreaker to ensure that `+[]{}` and > the like are not ill-formed due to ambiguity. Right, thats a good point. I'll make sure that is one of my tests. Thanks! CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D89559 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
