MaskRay added a comment.

In D120305#3347193 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305#3347193>, @nikic wrote:

> In D120305#3347192 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305#3347192>, @tstellar 
> wrote:
>
>> In D120305#3347177 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305#3347177>, @nikic wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, because you reverted the change for that one buildbot, of course it is 
>>> green now. You could have also made the buildbot green by disabling tests 
>>> on that bot. Or disabling sanitizers on it. Doesn't change the fact that 
>>> the configuration it was originally testing is still broken, you just hid 
>>> the failure.
>>
>> The build is green because of this commit: 
>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/274ec425dcc3e3f637dd006c5e9ae33bd0e2e917
>>   The buildbot change you are referring to, which is 
>> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-zorg/commit/b6ddf02ce3a54da2df29e7e599b1838167e0e3ad,
>>  has not taken effect yet, because the buildbot server has not been 
>> restarted.
>
> Wow, that's even worse. So now it's not just a change to that one buildbot, 
> but sanitizer tests were disabled for powerpc entirely?!

Only few sanitizer_common and lsan tests, not entirely. It should be re-enabled 
pretty soon once the llvm-zorg change is made live.
That was I mentioned that "we can enable the tests".

I think at this point, if you prefer, I am happy to revert this change the 
disabling (it needs quite a bit of tests), so that we can know whether -fno-pic 
and -fpie have a large difference on sqlite3 performance.

I lost my control when I saw https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305#3347058 and Tom's 
first reply to it.
For quite few hours yesterday, I did not know my fixed did not fix the problem 
or that nobody tried making llvm-zorg change work.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D120305

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to