MaskRay added a comment. In D136436#3876684 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D136436#3876684>, @SixWeining wrote:
> In D136436#3873987 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D136436#3873987>, @xen0n wrote: > >> In D136436#3873949 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D136436#3873949>, @SixWeining >> wrote: >> >>> How about the asm code in `.s`? Do we need to support `addi.d a0, a1, a2`? >> >> For the assembler part of this support, I think we need to coordinate with >> the GNU toolchain maintainers of LoongArch port (Chenghua, Zhensong and Lulu >> I think). Maybe raising an issue on the LoongArch documentation repo >> <https://github.com/loongson/LoongArch-Documentation> would help. >> >> For the GCC part, consistency is of course welcomed, and I think the >> Loongson maintainers or @xry111 could just submit the respective support. > > Well. To be honest, I'd like to keep only one form but not both. Seems other > archs only support one form? If we support both, will it make people > confused? Is mixed form allowed (`fmadd.d fa0, $fa0, f0, $fcc0`) ? Having just one form will be nice. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D136436/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D136436 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
