cor3ntin added a comment. I think the test we want is a set of classes and virtuaal fuc
In D155809#4551686 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D155809#4551686>, @philnik wrote: > @aaron.ballman I think what @danlark means is that when building clang > against a libc++ which has debug assertions enabled, the clang tests he > mentioned result in an assertion firing within libc++. i.e. the libc++ debug > mode catches the non-strict weak ordering that it gets from the clang code. > That's why he can't just add a test that fires the assertion. Currently, > there are no bots that build clang against a libc++ with debug assertions > enabled. What we are asking for is a standalone minimal test that doesn't depend on libc++ at all, living in `clang/test/` Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D155809/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D155809 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
