grigorypas wrote: > What exactly is the motivation for this? > > This also kind of changes the semantics of `alwaysinline`, which states the > functions should be inlined always unless illegal. I guess this can be viewed > as making inlining illegal in such circumstances, but a LangRef update would > probably be good either way.
Can you please elaborate what do you mean by it "changes the semantics of alwaysinline"? I am introducing a new attribute flatten_deep both on clang side and LLVM side. `alwaysinline` should still mean the same thing. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165777 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
