niXman wrote:

> > fixed! ping.
> 
> Not really, and there's no need for a ping.
> 
> > > Adding additional style options
> > > Each additional style option adds costs to the clang-format project. Some 
> > > of these costs affect the clang-format development itself, as we need to 
> > > make sure that any given combination of options work and that new 
> > > features don’t break any of the existing options in any way. There are 
> > > also costs for end users as options become less discoverable and people 
> > > have to think about and make a decision on options they don’t really care 
> > > about.
> > > The goal of the clang-format project is more on the side of supporting a 
> > > limited set of styles really well as opposed to supporting every single 
> > > style used by a codebase somewhere in the wild. Of course, we do want to 
> > > support all major projects and thus have established the following bar 
> > > for adding style options. Each new style option must:
> > > 
> > > * be used in a project of significant size (have dozens of contributors)
> > > * have a publicly accessible style guide
> > > * have a person willing to contribute and maintain patches
> 
> Can you at least comment on this?

Oh, I seem to have misunderstood the word "style" in the context of 
clang-format.
I took it to mean a concrete built-in style, like LLVM, Google, Chromium, 
Mozilla, WebKit...

Am I wrong?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190657
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to