niXman wrote: > > Oh, I seem to have misunderstood the word "style" in the context of > > clang-format. I took it to mean a concrete built-in style, like LLVM, > > Google, Chromium, Mozilla, WebKit... > > Am I wrong? > > It's not talking about a new style, but a new style option, and that is what > you want to add.
is it really better to have new forks appear, each user's own (usually abandoned and unsupported), and incompatible with others? on the other hand, clang-format has a good verification system, allowing new options to be added safely. P.S. I have 4 more PRs =) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190657 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
