jhuber6 wrote: > If upstream LLVM decides that only OpenCL C builtins are provided, then > that's a decision I could accept, it just means I'd have to add a software > fma implementation to mesa even though one already exists technically in > libclc and I'd rather just skip the work.
I'll need to double check if we expose any 'extensions' already, but we probably should in a formalized way. There's a lot of behavior that would best fit here and it'd be very limiting to only accept the official OpenCL standard. Everyone loves C extensions after all. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/199626 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
