arsenm wrote: > If upstream LLVM decides that only OpenCL C builtins are provided, then > that's a decision I could accept, it just means I'd have to add a software > fma implementation to mesa even though one already exists technically in > libclc and I'd rather just skip the work.
That's the current behavior, no? Last I checked only the OpenCL public names are exported? Are you not emitting calls to the various itanium mangled flavors of `fma`? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/199626 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
