zhangweize9-cyber wrote:

> I think maybe the way forward is to add only the assembly info, and leave out 
> the codegen info (i.e. `mayLoad`, `Uses`, `Defs`, `isBarrier`, `isReturn`, 
> `isTerminator`), which we can come back to when we implement code generation 
> for these instructions.

By the way, in which future major version are these features expected to be 
improved and supported?



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/215095
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to