fhahn accepted this revision.
fhahn added a comment.
Thanks for updating it to use the stuff from TargetParser.
LGTM, with tests for the cases @joerg mentiond.
Comment at: lib/Basic/Targets/ARM.cpp:345
// get default FPU features
+ llvm::ARM::ArchKind Arch = llvm::ARM::parseArch(getTriple().getArchName());
unsigned FPUKind = llvm::ARM::getDefaultFPU(CPU, Arch);
> fhahn wrote:
> > Is there a reason we re-compute the Arch from the triple here, but use the
> > member variable ArchKind above? Shouldn't they both be the same ?
> ArchKind is based on the triple and the CPU, where "Arch" is just based on
> the triple, so "Arch" was returning the wrong thing in some cases.
> Actually, looking a bit more, we should probably be calling parseCPUArch here
> to get the right behavior, rather than depending on the member. (It doesn't
> usually matter, but it could make a difference for code using "target"
> attribute, I guess. That feature needs a lot more work, though.)
Thanks that makes sense. getDefaultFPU and getDefaultExtensions are only for
cfe-commits mailing list