erichkeane added a comment.

In, @efriedma wrote:

> Basically, yes, although I was thinking you could be a bit more aggressive.  
> At least, anything marked "t" for custom typechecking is probably not 
> something which should be redeclared.

Ok, thank you very much for your help!  I'll see if I can accomplish soon!

  rC Clang

cfe-commits mailing list

Reply via email to