Eugene.Zelenko added a comment.

In, @JonasToth wrote:

> > It'll be good idea to have option to apply this check for 
> > pointer/references only, or include built-in types/enums.
> Agreed. I aim at a `mark handles const`(default on), `mark values 
> const`(default on for objects), `mark pointer (const int * >> const <<) 
> const` (default off)
> What do you mean by built-in types/enums? That they are configurable separate 
> to objects?

I meant integers/floating point numbers/Boolean/enums. It may be overkill to 
apply this check for legacy code base in single pass.

  rCTE Clang Tools Extra

cfe-commits mailing list

Reply via email to