JonasToth added a comment. @aaron.ballman @lebedev.ri The check is getting really complex. I run it over LLVM and detected some warnings, where iam not sure if they are valid or not. Its already a somewhat usable state, but its hard to determine false positives and false negatives.
For me, that false positives are worse for now, because they annoy. Its easier to add false negatives especially with user feedback. My idea is now: Take a look at refactoring the code to introduce const as fixit and iterate the check until LLVM compiles after the check fixed all missing consts. What do you think about that strategy? And could you take a look at the todo list at the top of `ConstCheck.cpp`. Did I miss something? Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D45444 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list email@example.com http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits