LD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi there,
Hi LD,
> >
> If I have the following as part of a template definition (in a file):
> [% self.CGI.h1(self.reflect.package) %]
<h1>[% self.reflect.package %]</h1>
looks cleaner to my personal taste.
> >
> ...it returns the proper name as expected. If I however do:
> sub someTemplate { \ <<'EOT'; }
> [% self.CGI.header %]
> [% self.CGI.h1(self.reflect.package) %]
> EOT
I don't have an answer to your question, but would like to make a
comment.
One of my initial criticisms of the CGI::Prototype docs was what you
are doing here. The call to $self->CGI->header is more general and
will apply to many more pages/objects than the current page. It does
not belong in the same method as a page-local call such as
$self->reflect->package: it is application-wide not page-local.
I think it belongs in render_enter in a base class... then, if a
particular page needs to send a certain content type, it can override
the method.
--
Carter's Compass: I know I'm on the right track when,
by deleting something, I'm adding functionality.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
cgi-prototype-users mailing list
cgi-prototype-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgi-prototype-users
