On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 01:54:42PM -0400, Michael wrote: > I'm going to go a head and try to make my plugin backwards compatible to > a degree, but I'm not sure how much that compatibility will be used > since I'm encouraging everyone who uses it to use the straight mod_perl api.
I think this is a good approach. However, you never know when code that was originally written for a mod_perl environment may need to be deployed into a mod_cgi environment. Not having to twiddle with it to get it to work in either situations would be useful. > This will make my job of keeping it compatible harder, but should make > everyone happier in the end. :) Yes, but you'll get some help along the way. It will be very useful to have common methods (header_*) which DTRT according to the environment they are in. William -- Knowmad Services Inc. http://www.knowmad.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=cgiapp&r=1&w=2 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
