Great, thank you On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Luke SanAntonio > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Okay, I understand now. >> I guess my take on the matter is a user who selects caching already has >> accepted >> that the data generated might not correctly reflect the actual data >> up-to-date... these users >> know it going in, so I don't think it's a huge concern... > > Yea, seems reasonable enough. > > Anyhow, it's merged here: > http://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/commit/?id=4608406c31900df07533bceef757692c966dd4eb
_______________________________________________ cgit mailing list [email protected] http://hjemli.net/mailman/listinfo/cgit
