On 29-09-12 20:43, Luke SanAntonio wrote:
Hi Jason,
First of all, good call with the cache, it hadn't even crossed my mind...
Second I think the cache isn't something we need to worry about...
mostly because
cgit is very lightweight, and I think for now, we don't have to be too
worried about
performance, correct me if I'm wrong though... Also it seems to me
I'd like to correct you on that.
Try running a server with many big git repositories with a cgit
interface on top, that is heavily used by people.
You'll really want to have caching.
Caching is not something I would like to see dropped or non-functional
that with or without the cache,
every cgit page I've ever come across seems to load in much less time
than a second...
Thanks for considering my patch =D
- Luke
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]> wrote:
Hey Luke,
Looks great, merged.
My one concern, however, which might make me reconsider merging this
patch is -- what about the cache? Adding explicit seconds makes any
caching appear even more out of date than just minutes. But maybe this
isn't a big deal. What do you think?
Jason
_______________________________________________
cgit mailing list
[email protected]
http://hjemli.net/mailman/listinfo/cgit
--
Ferry Huberts
_______________________________________________
cgit mailing list
[email protected]
http://hjemli.net/mailman/listinfo/cgit
