At this point it might be best if we just drop the patch... There is no reason to keep it around if everyone seems to be having doubts and questions... I am starting to have doubts myself, and there really isn't any reason to keep it around, other than looks... Sorry for the trouble -- Luke
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Ferry Huberts <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 30-09-12 23:33, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >> >> So much confusion. I'll reexplain: >> >> Before: >> You visit a page with cache turned on. It says "modified 1 minute >> ago".. You visit the page again a little later. It says "modified 1 >> minute ago". You don't really notice, because a minute is a longish >> amount of time. >> >> After: >> You visit a page with cache turned on. It says "modified 7 seconds >> ago". You visit the page again a little later. It says "modified 7 >> seconds ago". You do notice, because you're more intimately aware of >> the fact that a minute after seven seconds is more than seven seconds. >> >> >> This is the only concern. A bit silly perhaps. >> > > I don't care about seconds resolution. > The cache is exactly the reason we should not have seconds resolution > because it provokes all kinds of confusion (like this discussion) > > > -- > Ferry Huberts _______________________________________________ cgit mailing list [email protected] http://hjemli.net/mailman/listinfo/cgit
