|
I think some of
these things are slow only the first time you do the task -- and should
be fast from then on -- even if you rerun Chandler. So in the life of a
normal Chandler user, that doesn't always start with a fresh
repository, the slow situations are extremely rare:
+ Switching between calendars
+ Activating/Deactivation calendars using checkboxes
+ Changing the view - going week to week or clicking on mini cal
to go to a particular week
Sheila Mooney wrote:
I have been dogfooding Chandler for a while. Looking at
the complete list of performance scenarios...
The top 5 items that I find the most bothersome are...
+ Switching between
calendars
+ Activating/Deactivation calendars using checkboxes
+ Double clicking to create a new event
+ Stamping events as a communication
+ Changing the view - going week to week or clicking on mini cal
to go to a particular week
Sheila
On Jun 5, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Heikki Toivonen wrote:
We've set performance improvements as a
big item for alpha3, but one of
the problems we are facing is that we
don't have the performance tests
(yet) for the new use cases we are
interested in. (I'll be working on
these this week, now that we seem to have
gotten the Tinderbox perf
tests stable again.)
So, I would like you to respond to this
message to let us know what the
biggest performance issues are that are
bothering you when you are using
Chandler.
Thanks,
--
Heikki
Toivonen
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation
"Design" mailing list
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
|
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
