At 04:33 PM 2/13/2007 -0800, Ted Leung wrote:
So while README's are good, they aren't nearly enough.
Yes, I'm just saying that this doesn't seem to me to interfere or compete with Andi's proposal. Andi has uses for the functionality and the willingness+ability to develop it -- which is not really the case for what you're proposing, IIUC.
At least having README's and buildable plugins goes a good way towards having examples that others can tinker with. Improved ability to tinker (e.g. the menu proposal) is also helpful. Arguably, good tinkering support is at least as important as reference documentation and tutorials, which we already have several of.
Obviously, all documentation can always be improved, but in terms of rounding out what we have, Andi's proposal does help to fill out one of the weaker spots.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
