On Feb 13, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 04:33 PM 2/13/2007 -0800, Ted Leung wrote:
So while README's are good,
they aren't nearly enough.
Yes, I'm just saying that this doesn't seem to me to interfere or
compete with Andi's proposal. Andi has uses for the functionality
and the willingness+ability to develop it -- which is not really
the case for what you're proposing, IIUC.
At least having README's and buildable plugins goes a good way
towards having examples that others can tinker with. Improved
ability to tinker (e.g. the menu proposal) is also helpful.
Arguably, good tinkering support is at least as important as
reference documentation and tutorials, which we already have
several of.
Obviously, all documentation can always be improved, but in terms
of rounding out what we have, Andi's proposal does help to fill out
one of the weaker spots.
Andi solicited feedback on his proposal and I gave it. If you guys
want to ignore it, that's your perogative.
Ted
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
