I think that you should be asking why there are single commits of
500k. That's an unreviewable size...
Ted
On Nov 1, 2007, at 10:41 AM, Heikki Toivonen wrote:
Currently large commits (500k?) will end up in a queue that will need
manual handling. Typically bear has approved them all for trunk,
but has
deleted some branch commit messages. Yesterday a large trunk commit
got
deleted, which came as a big surprise at least to me.
I would like us to set a policy so that we can avoid surprises in the
future.
My recommendation is to never delete any trunk commits messages.
As for branches, I can see situations where a relatively old branch is
brought up to date, which can result in a huge commit message without
much value. Therefore I think it would be ok to delete large
merge-from-trunk messages. I think I would like to raise the limit to
something like 1 MB, though.
--
Heikki Toivonen
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
