On Nov 23, 2007 4:41 PM, Marcus Sundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Huh? Whose intelligence have I belittled?!? OK, maybe I was a bit hard > on that hypothetical person who made this hypothetical interface that I > only partly imagined might have existed. Oh, and I was (justifiably) > hard on the MS people who designed PowerPoint. > > If you meant something other than the above then please provide an > exact quote or give some other support of the rather harsh accusations > you imply. If it turns out I really did write something unjustifiable or > unfair then I'd apologize sincerely because it certainly wasn't my > intention. If, OTOH, you come to the conclusion that your interpretation > that I was confrontational and belittling was your own imagination then > I wouldn't mind getting an apology from you. Does this sound fair?
here are some sample phrases: "utterly useless" "hysterical about week- and month-overviews" "can't fathom not having the same limitations" "morons at MS" "I don't think you've thought this through" "complete moron" if you really think that we are going to be receptive to the attitude conveyed by this kind of language, you're mistaken. we're interested in ideas for improvement, but what you're doing is the equivalent of bursting into a room shouting expletives and generally acting like a boor. show some respect and moderate your tone if you want to be taken seriously. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
