> > Simply put, I just don't think you've thought this through, and your
> > comments indicate that you've never used a "week" view like the one
> > I described. (Or if you have then it must have been made by a
> > complete moron if he or she has managed to make it hard to get a
> > clear overview of the (rest of the) week, or unclear where the week
> > starts or ends, or which day is which.)
> 
> let me put something simply to you.
> 
> while you do have some very good points, the confrontational tone
> you're taking makes it hard to want to read any of them. perhaps if
> you didn't belittle everyone else's intelligence a conversation with

Huh? Whose intelligence have I belittled?!? OK, maybe I was a bit hard
on that hypothetical person who made this hypothetical interface that I
only partly imagined might have existed. Oh, and I was (justifiably)
hard on the MS people who designed PowerPoint.

If you meant something other than the above then please provide an
exact quote or give some other support of the rather harsh accusations
you imply. If it turns out I really did write something unjustifiable or
unfair then I'd apologize sincerely because it certainly wasn't my
intention. If, OTOH, you come to the conclusion that your interpretation
that I was confrontational and belittling was your own imagination then
I wouldn't mind getting an apology from you. Does this sound fair?


Regards,

Marcus
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

Reply via email to