Cool! That's awesome! I thought the discussion with the Sugar folks was quite interesting.
I know you are just at the very start of a 'hey lets check out this other project' with the Sugar folks, so there isn't any real way to answer the following question now, but i'm going to post it anyway. What is the benefit to Chandler of working with the Sugar devs? Now, i really really don't want to come off as overly-curmudgeonly (a bit is ok!), but Chandler is, as you are all well aware, at a turning point. I'd hate to see dev cycles put into a, admittedly cool in a helping-humanity way, project which doesn't really move Chandler forward for the non-OLPC/Sugar people. Anyway, i just felt that somebody need to say this, and to keep a watch on the cost-benefit ratio for this. I'd love to see some serendipitous collaboration come out of this - that would be the best case scenario! Again, i'm not poo-pooing anything, just trying to understand where the benefits and costs might be... Which might not be answerable right now. peace jos -- Jos Yule Digital Hyakugei _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
