Sounds good (sorry for the delayed response). I'll look over your pull requests today!
Lydia On 09/05/2014 07:00 PM, Francisco Souza wrote: > Hi Lydia, > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Lydia Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: >> [...] >> >> Details-wise, most of them will be independent of each other, although there >> are definitely those that will interact. I was going to be the main >> implementer, so we should check to make sure we aren't implementing the same >> function. The basic plan was to follow the same implementation pattern as >> https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/pull/192, and >> https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/pull/185 (although those function >> names have been altered by https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/pull/229, >> which should be taken into account), adjusting as the need arose. I've got >> a patch out for mkdir() right now, with the intention of adding octal (so >> it's nicer to deal with) and then continuing on to probably either exists() >> or chmod(). Is there one of the others that strikes your fancy? > I could go with simpler functions like chdir, chown and cwd, so I get > used to your flow, style and doesn't give you guys lots of newbie code > to review :) > > Is this ok? > > Thanks, > Francisco ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Chapel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users
