On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Lydia Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Francisco, > > We had considered implementing stat immediately, but upon looking into the > information it provides felt that there was a lot more in it than we > necessarily wanted to expose or allow callers to make use of right now. > We're open to providing it in the future if people make a case for it, > though :)
Could these info be private in the record/class and accessed only through methods, until we decide what should be exposed? Francisco ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce. Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Chapel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/chapel-users
