Brian

>All my ~pics have a globally set height, irrespective of the pics original 
>height. As long as you do not also specify with at the same time the browsers 
>do a proportionate shrinking. Very good for images and keeps the html for the 
>~pics pages, which contain thousands, rather minimal, easy to scan and 
>generically good for most all devices w/o special code.

---~
htp://pics.tgu.ca

greg
~krsnadas.org

--

from: Brian Schott <[email protected]>
to: Chat forum <[email protected]>
date: 1 November 2013 13:19
subject: Re: [Jchat] Newspaper columns are easier to read than books

>Yes, I looked more closely at the Atlantic Magazine page html. I searched for 
>`width=` and found 121 hits. The first one was as follows and I suspect it is 
>the key one.

<meta id="meta-viewport" name="viewport" content="width=1024" />

>I would not want to adjust the widths of images, for example, btw.

>I wonder if a way to handle such html would be by using a tricked out CSS page 
>that would cover things like tables and content -- whatever that is -- instead 
>of some other URL. I think CSS follows a strict hierarchy where the nearest 
>CSS instruction overrides more distant ones. But that hierarchy may mean that 
>the document itself has the greatest priority, so CSS might not work at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to