Yes, Raul, I have no problem with the output table. Instead of "instead of" I should have said "in addition to", because I am looking for a workaround to the problem I mentioned.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Brian Schott <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > I wonder if this suggest that instead of the output table being separate > > from the input table, maybe a dummy calculation area which excludes the > > current cell could be used temporarily? > > > I liked the clean modularity of having the output table be distinct. > > This is essentially how Excel works (except that rather than displaying as > separate tables you get to see input table cells only when they are > selected). > > Meanwhile, here's another source of data that might be fun to play with, > along with some suggestions about how to work with it (not all of which are > needed): > > http://www.chrisschnaars.org/viewing-fec-campaign-finance-reports-in-excel/ > > (The page content takes a bit of time to come up.) > > Thanks, > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- (B=) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
