Perhaps this would help:
from=: [: ($~ $-.1:) <@[ >^:L.@{ ]
+/ 0 from r
?
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Brian Schott <[email protected]>wrote:
> Yes, Raul, I have no problem with the output table.
>
> Instead of "instead of" I should have said "in addition to", because I am
> looking for a workaround to the problem I mentioned.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Brian Schott <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder if this suggest that instead of the output table being
> separate
> > > from the input table, maybe a dummy calculation area which excludes the
> > > current cell could be used temporarily?
> >
> >
> > I liked the clean modularity of having the output table be distinct.
> >
> > This is essentially how Excel works (except that rather than displaying
> as
> > separate tables you get to see input table cells only when they are
> > selected).
> >
> > Meanwhile, here's another source of data that might be fun to play with,
> > along with some suggestions about how to work with it (not all of which
> are
> > needed):
> >
> >
> http://www.chrisschnaars.org/viewing-fec-campaign-finance-reports-in-excel/
> >
> > (The page content takes a bit of time to come up.)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> > Raul
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
>
>
>
> --
> (B=)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
