Without specifying the technical realm, it's difficult to make useful
recommendations.

That said, I might suggest use an Oxford dictionary instead of or in
addition to a Webster's. The Oxford dictionary focusses on
representative uses of words which includes technical uses.

That said, he might also appreciate a CRC Handbook?

Thanks,

-- 
Raul

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 1:39 PM Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> For Dr XXY, English is a second language. One of many. His first language
> has never been studied, let alone learnt, by an outsider: it is spoken by
> hardly anyone outside his village, but they've all saved up to send him to
> Harvard.
>
> Dr XXY is on the point of reconciling Quantum Theory with General
> Relativity.
> His English is now good enough to read a road-sign and to buy food without
> pointing – and to use the internet.
> Especially to read the pearls of technical wisdom that fall from my pen.
> Not for pleasure, I might add: he wants to know more about J.
>
> I want to be helpful, so I adopt a chatty tone. Yesterday I wrote: "Do what
> you like but it doesn't do to do it all the time."
> It took Dr XXY an evening of intense investigation on ويكيبيديا to discover
> what I was actually saying. He did so on the off-chance it might turn out
> to be crucial.
> A lifetime of deep study has taught him the importance of attending to
> detail.
>
> Now Dr XXY is no dunce.
> I am. (I used not to be, but as I get older it's getting worse.)
> Dr XXY is not smart: he is super-smart. He holds the destiny of the world
> in his fingertips. I don't.
> He is not grateful to me for wasting his time. It mortifies me to know that
> I do.
> I'd have done better to write:
> "You are free to adopt your own strategy, but it's not good to employ this
> idiom in every situation."
> He'd have sussed that out in less than minute, using nothing but his
> well-thumbed Websters. Because the words I used, although they were big
> ones, were unambiguous.
>
> When I write technical stuff, Dr XXY is very much in my mind.
> Can anyone recommend a widely-used standard of technical English that would
> gladden his heart to read?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to