Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts about Freenet)

[Owen Williams]

On 19 Apr 2001 12:09:20 +0900, Sam Joseph wrote:

> So my question to you David, is do we actually need the ability to
> _anonymously_ distribute images to achieve any of the things you are
> talking about?  Or would _anonymous_ distribution of text do just as
> well?
> 

I reiterate:

1)  UU-encode means there will always be binary data.  See usenet
2)  If there is enough legitimate, useful data, people won't think
kiddie porn is a problem

owen

_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat