[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If you're against the ability to distribute pictures and other multimedia on
> *this* point-2-point networking platform, then you're perfectly welcome to
> go off and build your own text-only point2point network.
>
Which, as been stated before won't work, thanks to MIME and UUencoding.
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts abou... Sam Joseph
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts abou... Owen Williams
- Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts about Fr... Sam Joseph
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts... David McNab
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts... David McNab
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts... Kris Van Hulle
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts abou... Ian Clarke
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts abou... David McNab
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts abou... Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts abou... David McNab
- Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts about Fr... Sam Joseph
- Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts about Fr... Sam Joseph
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts... David McNab
- RE: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts... W. Eric C. Ferguson
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts... Tavin Cole
- Re: Child Porn (was: Re: [freenet-chat] Thoughts... moritz
