On 19 Apr 2001, at 12:26, Sam Joseph wrote:
> Owen wrote:
>
> > On 19 Apr 2001 12:09:20 +0900, Sam Joseph wrote:
>
> > > So my question to you David, is do we actually need the ability to
> > > _anonymously_ distribute images to achieve any of the things you are
>
> > > talking about? Or would _anonymous_ distribution of text do just as
>
> > > well?
> > >
>
> > I reiterate:
>
> > 1) UU-encode means there will always be binary data. See usenet
>
> Yeah, I heard you the first time. You don't think that UU-encoded
> documents could be filtered? Maybe you don't want to do that, fair
> enough, but don't tell me it can't be done without giving it some
> thought. English text has statisical properties not found in UU-encoded
> text. It could be filtered.
>
Um, I was under the impression that all data (text, etc..) on freenet
is encrypted - how the hell are you going to implement a language
filter on that ?
Kris
ps: for the record, i'm against filtering of any kind, since it defeats
the entire purpose of freenet
_______________________________________________
Chat mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat