Raul Miller wrote:
> I am having a problem understanding why
> (1&o.D.1 D.1 -: 1&o.D.2) (_78 0.9 1p1 1j1)
> 0
I agree there is a problem. I do not know if the algorithm is flawed, or
if it is just an inaccurate approximation (as has been noted before).
Here is a very simple example.
f=:*:"1
f D. 1 D. 1 (1 2)
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
f D. 2 (1 2)
1.9984 0
0 _1.11022
0.488498 0
0 1.9984
Best wishes,
John
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
