Thanks Don,

I added an eight second pause through youTube at the end (didn't even know I 
could do that before your comment!) I'll do this for all of the animations, as 
I don't see a downside to this (yet). Let me know if one pops up.

Cheers, bob

On -Mar8-2010, at -Mar8-201012:08 PM, Don Guinn wrote:

> Any way to keep the final image displayed at the end of the video instead of
> going to black? That way one can look at the final result and think about it
> if they want. Otherwise, make the final result display a little longer
> before it goes to black. It just goes away  too quickly.
> 
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:16 PM, bob therriault <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Skip,
>> 
>> I must admit at first glance I thought your suggestion would be more
>> confusing, not less. But after giving it a shot, with the slight adjustment
>> of covering the 'operation' with a + symbol instead of colour change
>> (discerning colours is not a strength for many), I have found I prefer the
>> approach you suggest. The results can be seen on the jwiki Plus (+) page:
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Vocabulary/plus
>> 
>> The concern that remains is whether you and I have already internalized the
>> matrix operations that we are attempting to describe for a new learner. As
>> Ian has suggested in another post, the only way to have an answer to that is
>> to get the response of new learners. In spite of the fact that J represents
>> an ongoing challenge to me, I don't think I can claim to have  the
>> perspective of a new learner any more. Still, the choices we are developing
>> will be useful when our audience arrives in the theatre.
>> 
>> Cheers, bob
>> 
>> On -Mar7-2010, at -Mar7-201010:43 AM, Skip Cave wrote:
>> 
>>> Bob,
>>> 
>>> Your last video is the best so far, but you still don't need to expand
>>> the arrays up before adding them. Just keep the arrays the same, and
>>> just slide/overlap them. You also don't need the plus sign to reappear.
>>> Just leave the plus alone, (you should still see it in the transparency
>>> or above the merge if you drop the two arrays) and slide the two arrays
>>> together.
>>> 
>>> No need for explosions either. A simple color transition after the sum
>>> has completed could indicate the new sum. This should be easier to
>>> develop since there would be no explosions, no array expanding, etc. and
>>> I think the subtlety is less confusing.
>>> .
>>> .Skip Cave
>>> .
>>> .
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to