Why not have some non-J people look at the animation? They are the ones who need to be understand it.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]>wrote: > I wasn't proposing a "simple" vote. From the discussion we have a > number of issues raised which could form the basis of a questionnaire. > (Of course there is "synergy"). > > I agree with Skip over this: a good anime for Plus could be the basis > for several other primitives. > > The tricky part (and it shouldn't be tricky) is: we lack a voting > booth, like so many chat groups have. > Never had the need for it before, of course. > > Ian > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:36 AM, bob therriault <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Ian, > > > > I don't see why not, although the current feedback gives me more > direction than a simple vote. Also there is the issue with experienced J'ers > making decisions for newcomers. At some point we will need to run the > options past our 'real' audience. > > > > Cheers, bob > > > > On -Mar10-2010, at -Mar10-20104:22 PM, Ian Clark wrote: > > > >> Is there any way the Chat list could take a vote? > >> > >> Ian > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:47 PM, bob therriault <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Thanks Brian, > >>> > >>> The landscape mode combined with the available video resolution does > constrain the approach of these animations. > >>> > >>> One concern I have about using the item to item approach with vectors > is the confusion it could cause between i. 3 and i.3 1 . The vertical > orientation avoids the overlap of items that would not interact, but it does > make it look as if we are changing the shape of the vector. I'll bang > together a sample and see how it looks. > >>> > >>> Cheers, bob > >>> > >>> On -Mar10-2010, at -Mar10-20109:15 AM, Brian Schott wrote: > >>> > >>>> Actually, upon reflection, Skip's layouts are more practical given > >>>> that the animation frames are in landscape, not portrait, orientation. > >>>> Still, I like the idea of maintaining the concept of J items, but > >>>> sideways as Skip has suggested, in this context. > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
