Great. I like it. CMIS is about ineroperability. So I think Implementations of diffrent languages is a must. And diffrent languages in one Project with similar APIs and usage should be a ambition.
Regards On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Stefane Fermigier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 20, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Paolo Mottadelli wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Florent Guillaume <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Jeff Potts from Optaros is interested in contributing his Python >>> cmislib (http://code.google.com/p/cmislib/) to Chemistry. >> >> That's good news, indeed. >> >> >>> In my opinion this would give cmislib a bigger community and would >>> make it more visible. >> >> Sure, I agree on this. >> Having a multi-language implementation within Chemistry is a good >> thing. I'd still pay attention in having more people working on this >> component instead of having a single author on it. >> I hope that somebody else then Jeff would be able, and willing, to >> contribute on the Python component within Chemistry. > > First of all, I would like to point out that we've already been working, > Florent and I, with Jeff on debugging compatibility issues between cmislib > and Chemistry (and Jeff has already been very helpful for improving the > Chemistry code). > > Also, cmislib has a test suite that can easily be adapted for various server > implementations, that's easy to launch, and act as a "second TCK", hence > improving the quality of the server implementations. > > Third, the Python community has several dynamic CMS communities, such as > Plone and Django, that will probably be quick to adopt cmislib and provide > feedback. > > S. > > -- > Stefane Fermigier, Founder and Chairman, Nuxeo > Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) > Web: http://www.nuxeo.com/ - Tel: +33 1 40 33 79 87 > New: follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/sfermigier > >
