On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:45:31 -0600, Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bottom line is: Cherokee includes cherokee-admin just to make > users life easier, if it weren't easy to use, natural, and coherent, > we would have failed even after having put a whole lot of work on it. Agreed. Though as per my previous comments, I wonder if it's the type of thing that should be given a lower priority until such time as the file syntax/rules/etc. has been properly documented such that it's easy to edit the file directly while the admin tool is perfected? Slapping an "Early alpha/beta" sticker on something provides enough "Okay, it's not finished yet" padding as long as there is a proper source in understanding the syntax of the configuration file. Apache's "If XML and Windows INI Mated" syntax is as ugly and as confusing as they come. And yet proper docs have seemingly caused people to look the other way. -- /M:D M. David Peterson Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: (206) 999-0588 http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://news.oreilly.com/m-david-peterson/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
