On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:43:38 -0600, Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That kind of environment would be pretty useful for the developer team > as well. In fact, it is not the first time we talk about setting up an > automatic benchmarking environment (imagine something like Tinderbox > but focused on performance). Basically, it would raise an alarm > whenever a commit has a negative impact on the server performance. Or an obscure positive impact! (see my last reply for my reasoning) > I don't think it is something we need right away, but it's definitely > a nice-to-have that we should keep under the radar. By now, our main > efforts ought to be focussed on improving the project marketing, > finishing Cherokee 0.8.0, and last but not least, continue writing a > decent documentation. +1 > Thanks a million David, your words are very encouraging! That's good to hear. :) Not everyone recognizes and/or appreciates constructive criticism. I'm glad to see that's exactly how it was taken. Keep the goodness coming! -- /M:D M. David Peterson Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: (206) 999-0588 http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://news.oreilly.com/m-david-peterson/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
