Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Leonel Nunez dijo [Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:24:24AM -0700]: > >> (...) >> The ubuntu packages has libavformat-dev as a depend but at compile time >> FFMpeg support gets disabled. This is for the old libformatav version >> >> So if I make a new streaming package I still need the new libavformat or >> make a modification in the configure stage so this package gets the old >> libavformat and FFMpeg support enabled >> > > Sorry, I've been unavailable lately due to an EWORKLOADOVERFLOW. Just > for the record, Leonel told me he would push his changes onto the > Debian packaging repository, and I'll work a bit on them. > > >> Pythonic something like : >> >> if oldavformat: >> avformat = 'ffmpeg/libavformat.h' >> else: >> avformat = 'avformat/libavformat.h' >> >> But in the configure.in or somewhere else.. >> > > That would be best done in debian/rules, /me guesses (without having > seen it at all). Least invasive way. Of course, we will want to drop > that line once you decide to deprecate older Ubuntu versions (and I > decide to drop older Debian versions, of course). > > Cherokee right now is a fast moving target but with great improvements that makes it worth to keep up with it I guess that when the 1.0 release well see how things get and then drop older versions or in My case .. keep maintaining the LTS versions but with a more stable cherokee release.
As I've said before I'd like to push a newer cherokee maybe 1.0 version to the LTS Ubuntu versions and see what happens with cherokee once it hits 1.0 version since as again I've said It would be painfull to maintain a 5.6 cherokee for Hardy Until 2013 >> FYI I'm working now on a Feature Freeze Exception for Cherokee 0.99.2 >> or 0.99.3 so it can be included in Jaunty prior release .. >> >> a 1.0 with big files upload would be great ;-) >> > > Regarding the feature freezes, if there are no known _bugs_ in the > 0.98 series, it's almost always preferrable to include a package which > has received broader testing than one having new, better features in > the official release. After all, that's the main reason you are > providing the unofficial repositories (and the main reason I will also > be packaging newer versions for Lenny backports as soon as I have the > time for that :) ) > > You are right .. If you want I can prepare lenny backports for you but first I need to do that push today .. saludos Leonel _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
