On 14-may-09, at 19:28, Antonio Ognio wrote: > >>> But for developers and power users I guess MacPorts is by far the >>> best >>> option, yes. >> >> You guys are pushing me to test it out.. :P > > How far in time do you estimate we are from the 1.0 release? > > I'd guess that for that kind of landmark release some hype must be put > in place and that's exactly the time when an easy way to get Cherokee > up and running in all main platforms will be greatly needed.
Wait! I don't think I've understood that. Are you saying that the only thing that we have to do boost the adoption of Cherokee is to bump the release number? If so, I'll not hesitate to release 1.0 within 5 minutes!! I thought that our great -and cheering- community would take that job done. Well, seriously.. I cannot think of a single reason for delaying those packaging efforts. They have nothing what-so-ever to do with the release number. In fact, I agree with you in the importance for providing different installations mechanisms so people get Cherokee up and running independently of the platform they are working on. -- Octality http://www.octality.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
