Also for higher compression with a 400 using 350 rods you can turn the 350
small block rods 180 deg. Thus bringing the piston higher to the top of the
block. You must have a strong starter in this situation though. I ran this
combo for some time years ago dirt tack racing. Man does it pack a wallop.

JDHall

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Thorburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] Small Block


> Hello Andre'
> Here is what I know.  The 400 Small block is the only Small block to come
> with 5.5" rods.  All the other Small-blocks came with 5.7" rods.  Chevy
did
> this . . . to make things fit better?  I am guessing that they did not
want
> the wrist-pin so high on the piston.  However, racers seem to "see"
> advantage in longer rods and high wrist pin placement.  The other
compromise
> was to simese the cylinder walls.  This means that there is no water
cooling
> where the cylinders are closest.  This might cause some minor distortion
in
> the cylinder wall because the non water cooled area will run a little
> hotter, however; that is "no big deal" compared to the fifty plus cubic
> inches gained.  The reason I mention it is: the two mods Chevy made, work
> against finding a good block.  First the shortened rods increase the "rod
> angle" a lot.  Increased rod angle puts side load on the piston, and wears
> out the cylinder walls faster.  The other modification, the simesed
cylinder
> walls, make it difficult to overbore much without serious overheating
> problems.  Chevy says: Maximum safe overbore is .030" on a Small-block,
and
> .060" on a Big-block.  I know machinists go way over those specs, but the
> risk is a engine that always runs hot.
>   OK, sorry for the negitivity.  Now for the plus side, my buddy Louie
wore
> out the 350 in his truck, and found a used 400.  WOW, the torque increase
is
> fantastic.  It is a completely different motor!  It sounds different
through
> the exhaust, and the off idle torque is unreal.  I will be looking for a
> big-CI Small block for my next project.
>
> Rob '67 Malibu
>         '67 El Camino (In a basket)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] Small Block
>
>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Does somebody know if a production (not bowtie)400 cid small block can
> > take 3,875" stroke without any big mods ?
> > Same question for 4" stroke.
> > We are talking about steel rods.
> >
> > Can a standard deck small block take longer rods than 6" (6,125" or
> > 6,2")
> >
> > max overbore is 0,040", right ?
> >
> > I'm asking because a friend wants to give me his 400 block
> > He says I can have it for free but i want to pay it, what is a fair
> > price ?
> >
> > thanks !
> >
> > Andr�
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
> > To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
> To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



-----------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to