RE: [Chevelle-list] GMPP 572

[Dale]

I’m sure everyone has their own ‘numbers’ but http://x-ram.com/dynotuning.html was my source.  I’m also sure that many tests would result in many answers just like the drop from 460hp on the first pull to 406hp on the second.  I agree that HP (or torque) per $ is probably not the most efficient on the 572 but still, 400 rear wheel hp is impressive.   Dale McIntosh 67 El Camino 1967 Chevelle Reference CD beta now available! ACES #1709/TC Gold #92 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:22 AM To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] GMPP 572   In a message dated 6/25/2005 11:06:22 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Given 35% loss for automatic trans - on average Never heard this before.......15%...MAYBE 20% MAX.  That 572 is a DOG for what it costs.